The Philadelphia Lawyer

WIN 2015

New and events of the Philadelphia Bar Asso.

Issue link: https://thephiladelphialawyer.epubxp.com/i/434516

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 47 of 51

46 the philadelphia lawyer Winter 2015 Book review W hen first together on the national stage 14 years ago, uber-lawyers David Boies and Ted Olson were on opposite sides of the "v" in Bush v. Gore. The "s"election of George W. Bush by the United States Supreme Court was not the only peculiar thing to come out of that debacle. This odd couple, the Dream Team of Boies and Olson, was born in that corrupt cauldron of counts, re-counts and butterfly ballots. Olson and Boies come from different ends of the political spectrum, but are now colleagues and genuine friends, in large part due to collaboration on their successful challenge to California's Proposition 8, the state constitutional amendment passed in 2008 (52 percent to 48 percent) preventing gay marriage in The Golden State. Their literary joint effort about that case is an excellent and fascinating tale of a major and noble pro bono victory by generous activists and two mega law firms that helped thousands directly and millions indirectly. But, let us not forget for a moment that these two legendary litigators cut their teeth and line their pockets representing scores of corporate masters against the interests of many more millions. Ted and David's excellent adventure takes the reader from the birth of this important and high-profile case in the Hollywood home of liberal activists, Mr. and Mrs. Rob Reiner, to the hallowed halls of the U.S. Supreme Court more than four years later. "Meathead" from "All in the Family" and his wife, embarrassed and depressed that their state had taken such a profound and backward step in history, led and helped finance the effort. As a litigator, what struck this reviewer was the classic mega-firm way of litigation – "spare no expense or resource," "if you can do it, you must do it" and "always plan for and expect massive discovery, multiple experts, trial and multiple appeals." While questioning the strategy and tactics of any victorious counsel, much less these two legendary brothers in arms, is risky, at best, it is disturbing, yet unsurprising, that at no point do they seem to have seriously considered a much more focused attack on the heart, nay the Achilles' Heel of their opponent's case. First, they really did not have an opponent. Technically, the governor, then Arnold Schwarzenegger ("The Governator") was the defendant since the challenge was to a state constitutional amendment. Wisely, Republican Schwarzenegger, like Democrat Obama, eventually came to support marriage equality and refused to defend. Attorney General Jerry Brown, later and now governor, likewise refused and went further formally opposing the Amendment in court. Rather than press for default and unopposed decision on the legal merits, the Dream Team, hoping to make this a cause celebre with as much national educational as legal value, decided not even to oppose the intervention by a well- financed, though rag-tag and odd group which had proposed and advocated for the passage of Proposition 8. District Court Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker, a known, but not publicly gay man involved in an unmarried, long-term relationship, granted the intervenors' motion and the battle, such as it was, was joined. Second, the opponents faced an uphill battle on the law, the facts and the comparative resources and talents of the teams. While few cases have their Perry Mason moments where opposing counsel makes a damning concession, where key witnesses drop out of sight due to fear of looking foolish or liars, where key "expert" witnesses recant and support their opponent, or where an opponent has absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support the key point in its case, this case had them all, and then some. Not all, but many cases have what I call one "Why in the world?" question, to which one must have a reasonable response under law supported by actual evidence in order to win. In this case, that was simply, "Why in the world would permitting gay marriage threaten or harm heterosexual marriage, children or society?" Boies and Olson nominally praise their opposing counsel, Charles "Chuck" Cooper as a "preeminent trial and By M. KELLY TILLERY redeeming the Dream – the Case for marriage equality Written by David Boies and Theodore B. Olson 320 pages $28.95, Viking, 2014 Dreaming of Marriage Equality Paper Tigers and Straw Men All Fall in The Case for Marriage Equality

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of The Philadelphia Lawyer - WIN 2015